Tupac Shakur’s Estate Threatens to Sue Drake Over AI-Generated Voice of Late Rapper

Rapper Tupac Shakur attends a voter registration event in South Central Los Angeles on Aug. 15, 1996. (Frank Wiese/AP Photo)

On April 24, the legal representatives of the estate belonging to the late American rapper and songwriter Tupac Shakur took action against Canadian rapper, singer, and actor Drake.

The estate issued a formal cease-and-desist letter concerning Drake’s alleged utilization of Mr. Shakur’s voice via artificial intelligence in his latest diss track, “Taylor Made Freestyle,” aimed at fellow artist Kendrick Lamar, according to Billboard, which obtained a copy of the letter.

In the letter, estate attorney Howard King described the use of Mr. Shakur’s voice as “a flagrant violation” of legal protocols and “a blatant abuse” of the artist’s enduring legacy.

After Mr. Shakur was killed in September 1996, his mother, Afeni Shakur, assumed control of his estate. She named former Interscope Records president Tom Whalley as executor, TMZ reported. In 2016, Ms. Shakur died and Mr. Whalley took control.

Mr. King wrote in the cease-and-desist letter that Drake would have 24 hours to remove “Taylor Made Freestyle” from all distribution platforms.

“If you do not comply, our client has authorized this firm to pursue all of its legal remedies including, but not limited to, an action for violation of … the estate’s copyright, publicity, and personality rights and the resulting damages, injunctive relief, and punitive damages and attorneys’ fees,” the letter said.

Related Stories

Judge Dismisses Drake From Astroworld Concert Lawsuit

4/12/2024

Ex-gang Leader’s Account of Tupac Shakur Killing Is Fiction, Defense Lawyer in Vegas Says

4/23/2024

As of the afternoon of April 25, the song was still published on Drake’s official Instagram account.

In the letter, the estate expressed profound disappointment and dismay at Drake’s unauthorized utilization of Mr. Shakur’s voice and persona against Mr. Lamar.

Asserting Mr. Lamar’s status as a close associate of Mr. Shakur’s estate and condemning the disparaging use of the late rapper’s voice against Mr. Lamar, the estate emphasized the disrespectful nature of Drake’s actions. Furthermore, the estate denounced the creation of a false impression that the estate endorsed or promoted the contentious track.

Public discourse surrounding voice cloning technology intensified last year with the release of “Heart On My Sleeve” by the artist Ghostwriter, which included AI-generated vocals resembling Drake’s voice.

This event triggered a widespread debate among industry stakeholders, legal scholars, and legislators.

The legal implications of voice cloning technology are complex, according to Billboard. Federal copyright laws may not be readily applicable due to the originality of cloned vocals, which often include new lyrics and melodies. The right of publicity, while potentially relevant, has historically been used primarily in cases of commercial use, not artistic expression, the outlet reported.

Drake’s Legal Woes

This is not the first time Drake has been accused of copyright infringement.

In 2022, Condé Nast sued the rapper for using a fake Vogue cover depicting him and fellow artist 21 Savage to promote their album, “Her Loss.” A federal judge issued an injunction ordering Drake to take down any fake images referencing Vogue. The parties settled out of court and details of the settlement were confidential, although the magazine initially asked for $4 million.

Also in 2022, former NBA Players Association head Billy Hunter filed a lawsuit against Drake, fellow rapper Future, NBA star LeBron James, and Mr. James’ business partner, Maverick Carter, alleging the defendants infringed on Mr. Hunter’s intellectual property rights when they produced the documentary “Black Ice.”

The film is about the Colored Hockey League, a segregated hockey league for black players in Canada founded in the late 19th century.

Mr. Hunter’s suit demanded profits from the film and $10 million in damages, claiming exclusive rights to produce any film about the Colored Hockey League. Mr. Hunter alleged a secret deal between the aforementioned defendants and George Fosty and Darril Fosty, the authors of the book “Black Ice,” who were also named as defendants.

Mr. Hunter had paid $265,000 to the Fostys for the exclusive rights to create a “motion picture” or “audiovisual adaptation” of the story. Mr. James and Mr. Carter were later dropped from the lawsuit, the New York Post reported.

The Epoch Times contacted attorneys for Mr. Shakur’s estate and Drake for comment, but they did not respond before press time.